Introduction
If you’ve been keeping up with the news, you’ll know it’s a tough time for first-home buyers. Housing affordability has hit an all-time low, leaving many Australians priced out of the market. To address this growing issue, a range of innovative—and sometimes controversial—solutions have been proposed.
In this article, we’ll dive into two key ideas: accessing your superannuation for housing and an alternative proposal we've named "Boomer Bonds"
We’ll explain how each proposal works, their potential benefits, and the challenges they might bring. Whether you’re a first-home buyer, a retiree, or simply someone concerned about the future of housing in Australia, this breakdown is for you.
Let’s start by reviewing the recent proposal to allow access to superannuation for housing purposes.
Section 1: Overview of the 'Super for Housing' Report
You’ve probably heard of superannuation—it’s that money set aside for your retirement. It’s compulsory, and usually, you can’t touch it until you hit retirement age. But lately, there’s been a lot of talk about whether Australians should be allowed to dip into their super early, specifically to buy their first home.
In response, some think tanks and policy experts have suggested changing the rules to let people use part of their super savings to buy or build a home. The proposal we’re looking at today takes this idea even further, expanding access to super for housing purposes.
Right now, the First Home Super Saver (FHSS) scheme (LINK) lets you save for a home deposit within your super fund at a lower tax rate. But this new proposal goes bigger, suggesting:
- Larger Withdrawals: Letting people take out more of their super for a home deposit.
- More Flexibility: Allowing withdrawals even if you’re not a first-home buyer.
The goal? To help more Australians get into the property market sooner and reduce the barriers to home ownership.
But here’s the big question: does this proposal really hold up under scrutiny?
Let’s take a closer look at the paper published by The Centre for Independent Studies in March 2025, authored by Matthew Taylor and Peter Tulip - The Super For Housing report.
Section 2: Key Findings and Recommendations of the 'Super for Housing' Report
Letting Australians use their superannuation early to buy their first home sounds like a great idea, doesn't it?. But how would this actually work, and what’s the report proposing? Let’s take a look.
What does the report propose?
The idea is to expand the existing First Home Super Saver (FHSS) scheme, allowing more people—not just first-home buyers—to access part of their super for housing. The core idea is pretty straightforward: your super fund becomes a resource you can tap into earlier in life, specifically to buy or build a home.
Here are the report’s key recommendations:
- Broadening Eligibility: Extend access to include not just first-home buyers but also existing homeowners looking to downsize or build.
- Withdrawal Limits: Let people withdraw up to a certain percentage (around 30%) of their super savings to fund a home deposit.
- Clear Restrictions: Set caps on withdrawals to make sure people don’t drain their retirement savings completely.
- Strong Compliance Measures: Ensure oversight by bodies like the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to keep everything above board.
The report argues that these changes could help younger buyers, in particular, get into the property market sooner. This could give them stability earlier in life and let them benefit from property value growth over time.
Economic and Social Implications
The authors back up their recommendations with economic analysis, predicting a few potential outcomes:
- More Home Ownership: Higher rates of home ownership among younger Australians and renters.
- Boost to the Housing Market: A surge in housing and construction activity thanks to more buyers with access to funds.
- Less Debt: Buyers might not need to rely as much on traditional mortgages, reducing their overall debt.
But it’s not all good news. The report also flags some risks, like:
- Short-Term Price Spikes: Property prices could rise due to increased demand.
- Long-Term Retirement Impacts: Using super for housing could mean less savings for retirement.
- Users are speculating on house prices rising, to an extent, and their super is safe in this asset class.
Next up, we’ll look at the strengths of the 'Super for Housing' proposal and why some experts think it could be a game-changer for Australia’s housing affordability crisis.
Section 3: Strengths of the 'Super for Housing' Proposal
The idea of using superannuation to buy or build a home has some pretty good advantages, especially when so many Australians are struggling to get into the property market.
Let’s look at the key strengths highlighted in the report:
Immediate Access to the Property Market
One of the biggest challenges for first-home buyers is saving enough for a deposit. Over the years, property prices have skyrocketed while wages haven’t kept up, leaving many young people, families, and lower-income earners stuck on the sidelines—even if they’re working hard and saving responsibly.
By letting people use their super for a home deposit, the report argues that more Australians could get into the property market sooner. This early entry could help close the wealth gap caused by delays in home ownership. In short, it’s about giving people a chance to build stability and wealth through property ownership earlier in life, rather than waiting decades to save up.
Clear Tax Advantages
Another big win is the potential tax savings. Under existing schemes like the First Home Super Saver (FHSS), money you put into your super for a home deposit is taxed at a lower rate (around 15%) compared to your regular income tax rate, which could be much higher.
Here’s how this could help:
- Save on Taxes: You could end up with more money in your pocket for your deposit.
- Encourage Saving: The super system already encourages disciplined saving, so this approach builds on that.
- Speed Up Savings: You might be able to save for a deposit faster, reducing the need to rely on parents or take on extra debt.
Economic Stimulus & Housing Construction
This proposal could also give the economy a boost. If more people can access their super to buy homes, it could lead to:
- More Construction Projects: Builders would have more work, which means more homes being built.
- Job Creation: More demand for construction could create jobs in trades, materials, and related industries.
- Economic Growth: A thriving housing market could support broader economic activity, benefiting everyone. Construction is a major pillar of the Australian Economy so there is trickle down effects to be had.
In practical terms, easier access to funding could mean more demand for new homes, which is great news for the construction sector and the economy as a whole.
Section 4: Weaknesses and Limitations of the 'Super for Housing' Proposal
While the idea of using superannuation to buy or build a home sounds appealing—especially in today’s tough housing market—it’s not without its downsides. Let’s look at the potential pitfalls and why they’re worth thinking about.
1. Impact on Retirement Savings
The biggest concern with this proposal is what it could do to your retirement savings. Superannuation is meant to be your financial safety net for later in life, ensuring you have enough to live on when you stop working. If you start dipping into it early for a house, you might end up with less when you need it most.
Here’s what could go wrong:
- Reduced Retirement Security: Even small withdrawals now can add up over time, leaving you with a lot less in your super when you retire.
- Increased Reliance on Government Pensions: If people have smaller super balances, they might need to rely more on government pensions, which could put extra pressure on taxpayers.
2. Housing Market Inflation Risks
Another big worry is that this scheme could push property prices even higher. If more people can access their super to buy homes, it could create more demand, driving up prices and making houses less affordable overall.
For example:
- Short-Term Gains, Long-Term Pain: While it might help some buyers get into the market sooner, higher prices could make it even harder for future buyers to afford a home.
- Affordability Crisis Worsens: The very problem this policy is trying to solve could end up getting worse.
3. Administrative Complexity and Compliance Challenges
Making this work wouldn’t be simple. Super funds and government agencies like the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) would have to handle a lot more paperwork, compliance checks, and oversight.
Key challenges include:
- Higher Costs: Managing the program could mean extra costs for both the government and super funds.
- More Red Tape: The added bureaucracy could slow things down and make the whole process less efficient.
4. Short-term Solution vs. Long-term Problem
Critics might argue that this proposal is more of a band-aid than a real fix. While it might help some people buy homes sooner, it doesn’t tackle the root causes of the housing affordability crisis, like:
- Not Enough Homes: There’s a shortage of housing supply, and this proposal doesn’t address that.
- Land Release Issues: Inefficient land release strategies are part of the problem, and this idea doesn’t fix them.
- Economic Inequality: The affordability crisis is also driven by broader economic issues, which this proposal doesn’t solve.
In other words, while it might help some people in the short term, it doesn’t deal with the bigger picture.
Section 5: 'Boomer Bonds'
Having explored the superannuation-based approach, let’s now discuss what we think is an innovative solution designed to tackle Australia’s housing affordability challenge: Boomer Bonds.
What Exactly Are Boomer Bonds?
The Boomer Bonds idea is all about tapping into the wealth of Australia’s baby boomers—those born between roughly 1946 and 1964. This generation owns a huge chunk of the country’s property and wealth, but many are nearing retirement and don’t have many safe, reliable ways to invest their money.
Anthony Painter
In this post we outline "Boomer Bonds" as a way to fund supply side and increase housing affordability. In times of crisis innovation is needed to shine a light forward and beyond. "To infinity & beyond" 'with boomer bonds' - as said, in part, by Buzz Lightyear
Here’s how they work:
- Baby boomers could invest some of their wealth into secure bonds designed to fund affordable housing projects.
- These bonds would offer a fixed, predictable return, backed by real property assets.
- The money raised would go straight into building affordable homes, helping younger generations, essential workers, and middle-to-lower-income earners.
In a nutshell, it’s about using the wealth of older Australians to fund housing projects that benefit the whole community—without dipping into the retirement savings of younger people.
How Boomer Bonds Would Work in Practice
- Investors (Baby Boomers)
- Retirees or soon-to-be retirees buy government-backed bonds that offer a stable, predictable return.
- Funds Raised
- The money from these bonds is used to build affordable housing or community-focused residential projects.
- Bondholders’ Returns
- Investors get regular returns, backed by rental income and property value growth. The government might even offer guarantees to make the bonds even safer and more attractive.
The Benefits and Community Impact
For Retirees:
- It’s a safe, reliable way to invest their wealth, giving them steady returns without taking big risks.
For the Housing Market:
- It pumps money directly into building affordable homes, helping to ease the housing shortage and stabilise prices.
For the Broader Community:
- More affordable housing means more people can find a place to live, which boosts social stability and reduces inequality.
Section 6: Comparative Analysis of Benefits
Now that we’ve looked at both proposals—accessing superannuation for housing and Boomer Bonds—let’s compare their strengths side by side. Each approach has its own unique benefits, and understanding these can help you see which one might work best.
Merits of Accessing Superannuation:
- Immediate Path to Home Ownership: The biggest win here is that it gives first-home buyers a much-needed leg up. With house prices so high, saving for a deposit can feel impossible. But if you can tap into your super, you might be able to buy a home sooner, giving you stability and a chance to build wealth through property.
- Tax Benefits: Schemes like the First Home Super Saver (FHSS) come with some handy tax perks. Basically, you can save for your deposit at a lower tax rate than your regular income, which means more money in your pocket for that home loan.
- Reduced Reliance on Debt: By using super for a deposit, you might be able to borrow less or even avoid a mortgage altogether. That could save you a ton on interest payments in the long run.
- Economic Stimulus: More homeowners could mean more demand for new houses, which is great news for the construction industry and the broader economy. It could create jobs and boost economic activity, which is a win for everyone.
Boomer Bonds Merits:
- Stable, Attractive Investment: For baby boomers, Boomer Bonds could be a safe and reliable way to invest their money. Many retirees have a lot of wealth tied up in property but not many low-risk options to grow it. These bonds offer predictable returns, which could be a big draw.
- Directly Addresses Housing Supply: Unlike the superannuation approach, Boomer Bonds focus on increasing the supply of affordable housing. By funding new projects, they could help ease the housing shortage and stabilise prices over time.
- Positive Community Impact: More affordable housing means more people can find a place to call home. That’s good for everyone—it promotes community stability, reduces social pressures, and helps tackle inequality.
- Inter-generational Wealth Transfer: This is a clever way to use the wealth of older generations to help younger ones. Instead of just driving up property prices, Boomer Bonds channel that wealth into building more homes, which benefits everyone in the long run.
A Quick Summary This Section:
| Accessing Superannuation | Boomer Bonds |
|---|---|
| Immediate homeownership opportunities | Stable, secure investment |
| Tax-effective savings for deposits | Directly targets housing supply issues |
| Stimulates economic activity short-term | Positive broader societal benefits |
| Reduces reliance on traditional mortgage debt | Does not affect younger Australians' retirement savings |
Section 7: Comparative Analysis of Weaknesses
While both proposals—accessing superannuation and Boomer Bonds—have their perks, they also come with some serious downsides and risks. Let’s break these down to give you a balanced view.
🟩 Weaknesses of Accessing Superannuation
- Impact on Retirement Savings
- The biggest worry with using super for housing is what it could do to your retirement savings. Superannuation is meant to be your safety net for later in life, reducing the need to rely on government pensions. If you dip into it early, you might end up with less to live on when you retire—especially if property values don’t rise as much as you’d hoped.
- Long-term Risk: Imagine reaching retirement age and realising you’ve drained your super too early. That could mean financial stress when you’re supposed to be enjoying your golden years.
- Potential Inflation in Housing Prices
- Here’s another catch: if more people can access their super to buy homes, it could push property prices even higher. More buyers with extra cash mean more competition, which could drive up costs and make homes less affordable overall. That’s the opposite of what this scheme is trying to achieve!
- Complex Administrative Burden
- Making this work wouldn’t be easy. Super funds and government agencies like the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) would have to handle a lot more paperwork, compliance checks, and oversight. That means higher costs and more red tape for everyone involved.
🟩 Weaknesses of Boomer Bonds
- Reliance on Market Adoption
- Boomer Bonds depend on baby boomers being willing to invest their money. If retirees aren’t interested, the whole idea could fall flat, leaving affordable housing projects underfunded.
- Implementation Complexity and Management
- Setting up Boomer Bonds isn’t simple. It would require careful planning, clear rules, and efficient management to make sure the money is used properly. The administrative workload could slow things down and make it harder to see real results.
- Liquidity and Return Concerns
- Retirees often want investments they can easily cash in if needed, or that offer higher returns. Boomer Bonds might not tick those boxes, which could make them less appealing to the very people they’re designed to attract.
Section 8: Impact on Different Demographics
Let’s break down how these two proposals—accessing superannuation and Boomer Bonds—could affect different groups of Australians. Whether you’re a first-home buyer, a retiree, or just someone concerned about housing affordability, here’s what you need to know.
First-Home Buyers
Accessing Superannuation
For first-home buyers, tapping into superannuation could feel like a game-changer. With house prices sky-high, saving for a deposit the old-fashioned way can take forever—think years, or even decades. Using super could fast-track that process, helping younger Australians get into the market sooner. But here’s the catch: you’d need to think carefully about whether it’s worth risking your retirement savings for a shot at home ownership now.
Boomer Bonds
Boomer Bonds don’t directly hand cash to first-home buyers, but they could still make a big difference. By funding more affordable housing projects, these bonds could ease the pressure on the market, making homes more available and prices more stable in the long run. So, while younger buyers might not see immediate benefits, they’d still come out ahead with more options down the track.
Retirees and Baby Boomers
Accessing Superannuation
This idea isn’t really aimed at retirees—unless they’re helping out younger family members or planning to downsize. But there’s a twist: if super access drives up property prices, it could make downsizing trickier or more expensive for retirees.
Boomer Bonds
Boomer Bonds, on the other hand, are all about retirees. Many baby boomers have a lot of wealth tied up in property but not many safe, predictable ways to invest it. These bonds could offer a steady return, helping retirees feel more financially secure. The challenge? The bonds would need to offer good returns and be easy to cash in if needed, which might be a tough balance to strike.
Broader Community and General Population
Accessing Superannuation
While letting people use super for housing might sound great, there’s a risk it could backfire. More buyers with extra cash could push property prices even higher, making homes less affordable in the long run. Plus, if people drain their super early, it could mean more pressure on the pension system—and that’s something taxpayers would end up footing the bill for.
Boomer Bonds
For the broader community, Boomer Bonds could be a win. By funding more affordable housing, they’d help ease the housing shortage, create jobs in construction, and boost social stability. But here’s the thing: these bonds would only work if enough retirees are willing to invest, and if the government can set up a system that’s transparent and well-managed.
Comparative Summary (Demographic Impacts):
| Demographic | Accessing Superannuation | Boomer Bonds |
|---|---|---|
| First-Home Buyers | Immediate entry to the market; risk of diminished retirement savings. | Indirect benefit through increased affordable housing supply. |
| Baby Boomers/Retirees | Minimal direct impact; potential family-assistance use case | Stable investment returns, but depends on returns and liquidity |
| General Population | Risk of inflating market prices, compromising broader affordability | Community-wide benefits from increased housing availability |
Section 9: Policy and Regulatory Considerations
Now that we’ve looked at how these proposals might affect different groups of Australians, let’s talk about another big piece of the puzzle: policy and regulatory considerations. Both the "Accessing Superannuation" and "Boomer Bonds" ideas come with their own set of rules and challenges that policymakers will need to tackle.
Accessing Superannuation
Regulatory Adjustments Required
Allowing people to dip into their super for housing isn’t as simple as it sounds. Right now, superannuation rules are pretty strict—early withdrawals are only allowed in special cases, like severe financial hardship or under the First Home Super Saver (FHSS) scheme. To make this work on a larger scale, here’s what would need to happen:
- New Rules for Super Access
- The government would need to update superannuation laws to spell out who’s eligible, how much they can withdraw, and what the money can be used for.
- There’d also need to be strict oversight from the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to make sure people aren’t misusing the funds.
- Tax Implications
- Policymakers would have to figure out how to handle taxes on these withdrawals. Should there be penalties? Concessional tax rates? Or maybe special incentives to make the scheme more attractive?
- The goal would be to keep the scheme appealing without undermining the whole point of superannuation—saving for retirement.
- The Admin Headache
- Let’s be real: this would create a lot of extra work. Super funds and government agencies would need to handle more paperwork, reporting, and monitoring, which could mean higher costs for everyone involved.
Boomer Bonds
Policy and Structural Support
Boomer Bonds are a different beast, but they’d also need some serious government support to get off the ground. Here’s what’s involved:
- Government Backing
- To make Boomer Bonds attractive to investors, the government might need to step in with guarantees. This would reassure retirees that their money is safe and secure, making them more likely to invest.
- Setting Up the Rules
- There’d need to be clear frameworks for issuing the bonds, managing the funds, and reporting on how the money’s being used. Transparency would be key to keeping investors confident.
- Oversight and Accountability
- Clear regulations would need to cover:
- How the funds are managed: Making sure the money actually goes toward affordable housing projects.
- Eligibility criteria: Deciding which housing projects qualify for funding.
- Monitoring systems: Keeping an eye on performance and compliance to ensure everything’s above board.
- Clear regulations would need to cover:
| Accessing Superannuation | Boomer Bonds |
|---|---|
| Regulatory amendments to superannuation laws required. | Government frameworks and potentially government-backed guarantees. |
| Clear ATO compliance and monitoring mechanisms essential | Robust guidelines required to manage and allocate bond proceeds |
| Potentially complex administrative and tax implications | Requires policy-driven incentives for adoption by investors |
Both of these proposals could make a real difference in tackling Australia’s housing affordability crisis. But here’s the catch: without clear, well-thought-out rules and frameworks, they could end up causing more problems than they solve.
Whether it’s superannuation withdrawals or Boomer Bonds, getting the details right is required to avoid unintended consequences—like messing up the housing market even further or putting extra strain on the economy.
Key Takeaways from the Super For Housing Report
Let’s break down the key takeaways from the report:
1. Super for Housing: A Quick Fix for Deposits?
The big idea here is simple: let Australians—especially younger, first-home buyers—use part of their superannuation to buy a home or cover a deposit. The report argues this could help people get into the property market faster, giving them stability and a shot at building wealth through home ownership sooner rather than later.The authors argue that such access could significantly alleviate the deposit barrier that many Australians currently face, potentially speeding up home ownership and delivering stability earlier in life.
2. The Good and the Bad: Economic Upsides and Risks
The report doesn’t shy away from the fact that this idea comes with both benefits and risks. On the plus side, more homeowners could boost the economy, especially in construction and related industries. But there’s a catch: unlocking super early might push property prices even higher, which could cancel out some of the affordability gains.
3. What About Retirement?
Here’s the big concern: using super for housing could eat into your retirement savings. The report acknowledges this risk and suggests ways to manage it, like setting limits on how much you can withdraw and making sure there’s strong oversight to prevent misuse.
4. It’s Not Simple: The Admin Headache
Let’s be real—this isn’t an easy fix. The report admits that managing super withdrawals for housing would be complicated. It would require new rules, more oversight from bodies like the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), and a lot of paperwork.
What We Think: The Pros and Cons
The Good Stuff:
- The idea of using super for housing could be a game-changer for people struggling to save a deposit. In today’s tough market, it’s a lifeline for many Australians who just want a place to call home.
The Not-So-Good Stuff:
- While the report talks about the risks to retirement savings, we’re not convinced the proposed safeguards are enough. Let’s face it—when people are desperate to buy a home, they might not think about the long-term impact on their super. This could lead to bigger problems down the track, like more people relying on government pensions.
- Another big issue? The report doesn’t really tackle the root cause of the housing crisis: there just aren’t enough homes. If we boost buyers’ purchasing power without building more houses, prices could go up even more, making the problem worse.
Our Final Thoughts
We think the report is onto something by addressing the deposit hurdle—it’s a real problem, and this proposal could help. But here’s the thing: it’s only part of the solution.
To really fix the housing crisis, we need to tackle the supply side too. That means building more homes, releasing more land, and making construction faster and more efficient. Without these changes, the benefits of using super for housing might be short-lived, and we could end up with even bigger problems in the future.
So, our position? Cautious support. We’re open to the idea, but only if it’s paired with serious efforts to increase housing supply and strong rules to protect retirement savings.
Conclusion
Australia’s housing affordability crisis is a tough nut to crack, and it’s going to take some creative thinking and careful evaluation of the options on the table. In this post, we’ve looked at two very different approaches—accessing superannuation for housing (based on the Super For Housing Report) and the introduction of Boomer Bonds—and weighed up their pros, cons, regulatory challenges, and impacts on different groups of Australians.
The Super for Housing Proposal: A Quick Fix with Risks
The idea of using superannuation to buy a home is undeniably appealing, especially for those struggling to save a deposit. It offers a fast track into the property market and comes with some handy tax perks that could help people save for a deposit quicker. But, as we’ve seen, it’s not without its downsides. The biggest concerns? It could eat into your retirement savings and might even push property prices higher, making the affordability problem worse in the long run.
Boomer Bonds: A Supply-Side Solution
On the other hand, Boomer Bonds take a different approach. Instead of focusing on buyers, they tap into the wealth of retirees to fund affordable housing projects. It’s a clever idea that could deliver stable returns for investors while boosting housing supply and helping the broader community. But let’s be honest—its success depends on getting enough retirees on board, setting up clear rules, and making sure the whole system is well managed.
Our Take: Balance is Key
Here’s the bottom line: any solution to Australia’s housing crisis needs to strike a balance between short-term relief and long-term stability.
While the superannuation proposal offers quick help for buyers, it doesn’t tackle the root cause of the problem—there just aren’t enough homes. Boomer Bonds, on the other hand, focus on increasing supply, which is a step in the right direction, but they’re not a silver bullet either.
Our recommendation? Policymakers should consider both approaches, but with caution. The priority should be on policies that boost housing supply directly, supported by strong regulations to make sure everything runs smoothly. After all, solving the housing crisis isn’t just about helping people buy homes today—it’s about making sure everyone has a fair shot at a stable, affordable place to live in the future.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- What is the First Home Super Saver (FHSS) scheme?
- It's an existing government scheme that lets first-home buyers save for their home deposit within their super, offering concessional tax treatment.
- Can accessing superannuation solve Australia's housing affordability crisis?
- Not entirely. It provides immediate relief but could increase house prices if supply isn't also addressed.
- How do Boomer Bonds work exactly?
- They're secure bonds allowing baby boomers to invest their wealth directly into affordable housing projects, earning stable, predictable returns.
- Will withdrawing super for housing affect my retirement plans negatively?
- Yes, early withdrawal may significantly impact your retirement savings and future financial security.
- Are Boomer Bonds government-backed investments?
- They could be, depending on policy design. Government backing would increase their security and appeal.
- What are the administrative concerns with accessing super for housing?
- Increased complexity, regulatory oversight, and higher administrative costs are the primary concerns.
- Would Boomer Bonds be attractive investments for retirees?
- Potentially yes, as they provide stable, secure returns and community benefits, but appeal depends on returns offered and liquidity options.
- Could using super for housing inflate property prices further?
- Experts widely agree this is a significant risk, as increased demand could drive prices even higher.
- How can policymakers ensure either strategy is effective?
- Clear guidelines, robust regulatory oversight, and addressing underlying housing supply issues will be essential.
- Should homeowners rely solely on these schemes to address housing affordability?
- No, homeowners should also explore other financial solutions, grants, and incentives available.
Further Reading
Anthony Painter
Anthony Painter
Anthony Painter
PS: If you haven’t tried out our new AI tools yet, here are the links to check them out!
Why use them? Got construction questions you need answers to? Our specialised AI-powered tools are built on our extensive knowledge base, including blog posts, checklists, and subject-specific content—tailored to help you navigate construction with confidence.
Anthony Painter
Anthony Painter
Anthony Painter
Anthony Painter
Anthony Painter
Quality Management Checklist Access
All our published checklists are available to download via the Checklists Link in the navigation menu or directly at https://www.constructor.net.au/checklists/.
Anthony Painter
Please note: You’ll need to be a member and to log in to access the content.
